TexasSwede
texasswede@gmail.com
  • About this blog
  • My Website
  • My Resume
  • XML Export Tool
  • Photos

Monthly Archives: September 2012

Movie Review: Looper

Posted on September 29, 2012 by Karl-Henry Martinsson Posted in Old Blog Post, Reviews Leave a comment

Last night I went to see Looper. I had actually not heard much about it, but I looked it up online real quick and at least it sounded like a good premise for a movie. I have always enjoyed sci-fi, and especially time-travel.

The premise is that Joe is a "looper", a contract killer in a near future (2044). About 30 years after that, time-travel has been invented, but declared illegal. So only the biggest crime syndicates have access to time-travel, and they use it to get rid of people. The send the victim back 30 years in time, bound and gagged with a hood over their heads. The looper promptly kills them and disposes of the body. The looper is paid with silver attached to the victim. Occasionally the future version of the looper is sent back, who kills his older himself. The is called "closing the loop".

Joe (played by an excellent Joseph Gordon-Levitt) is a looper. One day his future self (Bruce Willis) shows up, but promptly escapes. In the future, a new gangster boss, "The Rainmaker" has taken over, and he is closing the loop on all loopers. In doing so, the future Joe lost his wife, and he is now looking to prevent this by finding the young Rainmaker in the past and kill him.

I truly enjoyed this movie, it was absolutely much better than I had expected, and it makes you think more than the average movie. The story is clever and it works. You see influences of both Back to The Future and The Terminator in the story, as well as to Carrie and X-Men (with the concept of telekinesis), but it all fits well into the story.

I would highly recommend this movie. However, it´s not a movie for kids, due to violence (and for sensitive Americans, some nudity).

 

Are inexperienced developers the death of Notes?

Posted on September 11, 2012 by Karl-Henry Martinsson Posted in Generic, Old Blog Post, Programming Leave a comment

Lately I have been more active in the IBM DeveloperWorks forums, as well as on StackOverflow, trying to help people with development problems. As I am just myself starting with Xpages, I been staying in the forums for "classic" Notes development.
I have noticed a trend, based on the postings. It seems like there is a substantial number of new developers who are not very familiar with Notes/Domino development. They sometimes think Domino works like a relational database.
There are then several who are posting about very simple things, that can easily be found in the online help, or by looking at the properties for an element. Like how to extend the last column in a view to use all available space.
There was even one user asking about how to duplicate a specific @Formula in Lotusscript, when the help file got a cross reference to the class and method to use…

There are others who does not seem to even understand the basics, either when it comes to programming in general or specifically of Notes/Domino.
Some of them don't understand data types. They declare a variable as integer, then make a calculation that results in a value of say 3.5, and is then wondering why the result is 4.
Others don't understand the difference between strings and variables, they are surprised when @SetField("myField"; "myField + 1") does not give them the expected result (the value in the field ‘myField’ increased by one).

On StackOverflow it is possible to see what other areas the user posted in. Some of the users seems to have a background in Java, SQL, .NET or other platforms. My guess is that they been thrown into a Notes projekt after their company took on a new development project, with the hope that they could learn it quickly. I think this could be dangerous, from some of the code I have seen, the lack of experience and understanding of the Notes/Domino platform will cause sub-standard or slow code, which of course will make executives think that Notes is a bad development platform. After all, if the expensive consulting company (or the off-shore based development house with all developers being at least Ph.D.) can't write fast and good code, the platform must be at fault, right?

Another thing I noticed over the last year or so is that in the Notes-related groups on LinkedIn, there has been a number of requests for the answers to the IBM certification tests. They have originated from both some big consulting companies and from within IBM. None of them were from the US (or Europe, if I remember correctly), but from countries more traditionally associated with outsourced or "off-shore" development. My guess is that the companies want their developers to be certified on paper, as they can either charge higher rates, or pass themselves off as being “experts” on the platform.
A number of the questions in the DeveloperWorks forums were posted under names that often are associated with the same countries/regions.

What I think we are seeing is the result of American and (in some part) European companies using cheaper off-shore development companies in order to save money. What they don't think of is that, unless the developers has a good knowledge of the product, that a local developer with many years of experience will create the same or better result in a much shorter time. So even at a higher hourly rate, the end result will be less expensive as well as better.

I want to make it clear that I don't think all developers in the countries typically associated with off-shoring (India, China, Russia, the Baltic states, Brazil, etc) are bad programmers. I know very competent developers from several of those countries, and I know some not-so-good developers in Europe and North America.

What I am afraid of is that off-shore development companies takes on Notes-projects, expecting (or hoping) their staff will quickly learn the product/platform and quickly develop the requested solution. In the process they are making Notes look bad as they don't understand the platform.
At the same time, the companies that is purchasing the solution are just looking at the hourly rate, and perhaps an initial estimate of how quick and inexpensive (due to low hourly rates) the project is promised to be completed. In the long run, I fear that Notes/Domino as a platform will suffer because of this.

The project management triangle  is still true:

You are given the options of Fast, Good and Cheap, and told to pick any two. Here Fast refers to the time required to deliver the product, Good is the quality of the final product, and Cheap refers to the total cost of designing and building the product. This triangle reflects the fact that the three properties of a project are interrelated, and it is not possible to optimize all three – one will always suffer. In other words you have three options:

Design something quickly and to a high standard, but then it will not be cheap.
Design something quickly and cheaply, but it will not be of high quality.
Design something with high quality and cheaply, but it will take a long time.

ProjectTriangle

Of course, an experienced Notes/Domino developer can make the rule somewhat invalid, but it requires extensive experience. :-)

I don’t have a good solution. Perhaps companies thinking about outsourcing development need to be more diligent at selecting developers, requesting details about their previous experience, etc. Perhaps they need to ask more questions, including how many years of Notes/Domino experience the developers have. Personally, I would not suggest hiring a consulting company who haven’t had a presence at Lotusphere or at least had some of their developers speak there or at any of the LUG-conferences around the world. Many of the best Notes developers also got blogs where they post code and/or information, I would require a link to some blogs as well, so I could judge the quality of their code.

 

HCL Ambassador 2020

HCL Ambassador 2020

IBM Champion 2014-2020

Stack Exchange

profile for Karl-Henry Martinsson on Stack Exchange, a network of free, community-driven Q&A sites

Notes/Domino Links

  • Planet Lotus Planet Lotus
  • IBM dW Forums IBM dW Forums
  • StackOverflow StackOverflow

Recent Posts

  • Notes and Domino v12 is here!
  • NTF Needs Your Help
  • Helpful Tools – Ytria EZ Suite (part 2)
  • Busy, busy – But wait: There is help!
  • Semantic UI – An alternative to Bootstrap?

Recent Comments

  • Lotus Script Multi-thread Message Box [SOLVED] – Wanted Solution on ProgressBar class for Lotusscript
  • Viet Nguyen on Keep up with COVID-19 though Domino!
  • Viet Nguyen on Keep up with COVID-19 though Domino!
  • Mark Sullivan on Looking for a HP calculator? Look no further!
  • Lynn He on About This Blog

My Pages

  • How to write better code in Notes

Archives

  • June 2021 (1)
  • April 2021 (2)
  • March 2021 (1)
  • August 2020 (3)
  • July 2020 (2)
  • April 2020 (2)
  • March 2020 (1)
  • December 2019 (2)
  • September 2019 (1)
  • August 2019 (2)
  • July 2019 (2)
  • June 2019 (3)
  • April 2019 (2)
  • December 2018 (1)
  • November 2018 (1)
  • October 2018 (5)
  • August 2018 (2)
  • July 2018 (3)
  • June 2018 (2)
  • May 2018 (1)
  • April 2018 (2)
  • March 2018 (1)
  • February 2018 (2)
  • January 2018 (4)
  • December 2017 (3)
  • November 2017 (2)
  • October 2017 (2)
  • September 2017 (1)
  • August 2017 (2)
  • July 2017 (6)
  • May 2017 (4)
  • February 2017 (1)
  • January 2017 (2)
  • December 2016 (2)
  • October 2016 (3)
  • September 2016 (4)
  • August 2016 (1)
  • July 2016 (2)
  • June 2016 (2)
  • May 2016 (3)
  • April 2016 (1)
  • March 2016 (4)
  • February 2016 (2)
  • January 2016 (4)
  • December 2015 (3)
  • November 2015 (2)
  • October 2015 (1)
  • September 2015 (2)
  • August 2015 (1)
  • July 2015 (5)
  • June 2015 (2)
  • April 2015 (2)
  • March 2015 (3)
  • February 2015 (2)
  • January 2015 (10)
  • December 2014 (1)
  • November 2014 (3)
  • October 2014 (3)
  • September 2014 (13)
  • August 2014 (6)
  • July 2014 (5)
  • May 2014 (3)
  • March 2014 (2)
  • January 2014 (10)
  • December 2013 (5)
  • November 2013 (2)
  • October 2013 (5)
  • September 2013 (4)
  • August 2013 (7)
  • July 2013 (3)
  • June 2013 (1)
  • May 2013 (4)
  • April 2013 (7)
  • March 2013 (8)
  • February 2013 (9)
  • January 2013 (5)
  • December 2012 (7)
  • November 2012 (13)
  • October 2012 (10)
  • September 2012 (2)
  • August 2012 (1)
  • July 2012 (1)
  • June 2012 (3)
  • May 2012 (11)
  • April 2012 (3)
  • March 2012 (2)
  • February 2012 (5)
  • January 2012 (14)
  • December 2011 (4)
  • November 2011 (7)
  • October 2011 (8)
  • August 2011 (4)
  • July 2011 (1)
  • June 2011 (2)
  • May 2011 (4)
  • April 2011 (4)
  • March 2011 (7)
  • February 2011 (5)
  • January 2011 (17)
  • December 2010 (9)
  • November 2010 (21)
  • October 2010 (4)
  • September 2010 (2)
  • July 2010 (3)
  • June 2010 (2)
  • May 2010 (3)
  • April 2010 (8)
  • March 2010 (3)
  • January 2010 (5)
  • November 2009 (4)
  • October 2009 (7)
  • September 2009 (1)
  • August 2009 (7)
  • July 2009 (1)
  • June 2009 (4)
  • May 2009 (1)
  • April 2009 (1)
  • February 2009 (1)
  • January 2009 (3)
  • December 2008 (1)
  • November 2008 (1)
  • October 2008 (7)
  • September 2008 (7)
  • August 2008 (6)
  • July 2008 (5)
  • June 2008 (2)
  • May 2008 (5)
  • April 2008 (4)
  • March 2008 (11)
  • February 2008 (10)
  • January 2008 (8)

Categories

  • AppDev (9)
  • Blogging (11)
    • WordPress (5)
  • Design (5)
    • Graphics (1)
    • UI/UX (2)
  • Featured (5)
  • Financial (2)
  • Food (5)
    • Baking (3)
    • Cooking (3)
  • Generic (11)
  • History (5)
  • Hobbies (10)
    • LEGO (4)
    • Photography (4)
  • Humor (1)
  • IBM/Lotus (175)
    • #Domino2025 (14)
    • #DominoForever (8)
    • #IBMChampion (46)
    • Administration (7)
    • Cloud (7)
    • CollabSphere (8)
    • Community (47)
    • Connect (33)
    • ConnectED (12)
    • Connections (3)
    • HCL (12)
    • HCL Master (1)
    • IBM Think (1)
    • Lotusphere (46)
    • MWLUG (25)
    • Notes/Domino (97)
      • Domino 11 (7)
    • Sametime (8)
    • Verse (14)
    • Volt (2)
    • Watson (6)
  • Life (8)
  • Microsoft (7)
    • .NET (2)
    • C# (1)
    • Visual Studio (1)
  • Movies (3)
  • Old Blog Post (259)
  • Personal (23)
  • Programming (83)
    • App Modernization (11)
    • Formula (4)
    • Lotusscript (46)
    • NetSuite (4)
      • SuiteScript (3)
    • node.js (4)
    • XPages (4)
  • Reviews (9)
  • Sci-Fi (4)
  • Software (24)
    • Flight Simulator (2)
    • Games (4)
    • Open Source (2)
    • Utilities (6)
  • Technology (37)
    • Aviation (3)
    • Calculators (2)
    • Computers (6)
    • Gadgets (7)
    • Mobile Phones (7)
    • Science (3)
    • Tablets (2)
  • Travel (6)
    • Texas (2)
    • United States (1)
  • Uncategorized (15)
  • Web Development (50)
    • Frameworks (23)
      • Bootstrap (14)
    • HTML/CSS (12)
    • Javascript (32)
      • jQuery (23)

Administration

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Tracking

Creeper
MediaCreeper
  • Family Pictures
© TexasSwede 2008-2014